I want to talk about guns.
Scratch that, I want to
talk about gun violence.
That’s not it either, I
want to talk about America’s obsession with guns. Actually I think obsession is
the wrong word. I think addiction is the right one to use. America is addicted
to guns and it is killing all of us. Much like any addiction it is bad and it
should be dealt with as we deal with any addiction.
In fact, this should not
be a discussion. Like some things in life there really is no discussion it is
just a known fact that we do not do those things. Yet we continue to run into
people who think guns are the answer. So instead of treating this situation
like we treat a 1-year-old standing on wobbly chairs we allow gun owners to
totter wildly until the chair comes crashing to the floor and someone gets
hurt. Instead of thinking perhaps we shouldn’t stand on wobbly chairs, we all
get wobblier chairs and start playing musical chairs while juggling live
grenades.
Just think about that for a
second. We react to horrible situations like what happened at the Pulse
nightclub in Orlando and Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut by
buying more of the thing that does the killing. When there is a reported case
of mad cow we stop buying beef, because it can kill you. Yet there have only
been 4 reported cases of Mad Cow Disease in the United States and it cost the
beef industry close to $5 billion. After Sandy Hook the gun industry took in
about $630 million. So if the beef industry loses $5 billion dollars for 4
cases and the gun industry gains about $630 million after each mass shooting
let’s do the math.
998 mass shootings since
Sandy Hook (why don’t we round that to a nice neat 1000) x 630 million = $630
billion dollars in 3 years and six months (the time between Sandy Hook and
Orlando). What the inconceivable fuck! I am trying not to curse. To keep this
as family friendly as possible but sometimes I just lose my mind.
You know what you can do
with $630 billion? A lot of stuff that’s for sure. I mean a slice of pizza at Costco
only costs $1. I could give everyone in the world 84 pieces of pizza. Hell, I
could buy Costco and give out the pizza for free and still make money off all
the groceries and other stuff. In fact, with $630 billion
I could afford to buy Donald J. Trump’s “empire”, which he says is worth only
$10 billion. Perhaps though instead I will just run for president against him.
I could literally fund every candidates campaign and still have over $620
billion to live off of (using the total amounts of $10 billion spent in 2012).
I have gotten off track
with this money thing but in truth have I? Think about how much money that is
for just a second and realize that these are the people dumping money into our politician’s pockets. They can literally fund every single candidates
campaign and in the end walk away with a profit and no fear of losing out on
any future profit because Every. Single. Politician. Is in their hands. So how
can we expect anything to change when it comes to gun control laws?
Granted what I have
presented to you is purely a hypothetical, at least them giving money to every
politician. The amount is hypothetical to a degree but it is not hard to assume that the number spike after each shooting. It would still most likely more money than Donald J. Trump has,
or will ever have. So how do we combat this sort of thing? Why does this keep
happening? Why can’t we agree on anything?
The answer to the first
question is a lot harder than you think because we don’t truly understand the
answer to number three yet. The second question though is easily answered. This
keeps happening because we allow money to control our decisions. I know this
seems like an over simplification of the problem but in truth if we stopped
allowing money to do the talking when it came to our politicians we might
actually get something done in this country.
That being said I know
that most people would blame the wording of the second amendment as the answer
to the third question and they would be mostly right. The second amendment has
caused way more problems for our country then it has solved. Just look at the wording and see why it is such a problem, “A well regulated militia,being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people tokeep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
To best understand why this sort
of amendment was placed in the bill of rights we have to look at the record of
human history. Up until this point in time (1776) there had never been a truly
democratic state. Or at least a democratic state in which the people had power
(although the majority of people would not have full rights until the 20th
century). A free state not ruled by a king or queen. A nation built by the
people for the people. So in the best interest of not allowing some power
hungry fool (Donald Trump?) to claim himself king they wanted the people to be able to rise up
and take back the country. They just had one problem. The people most afraid of
that happening were the ones who took power in the first place and laid the
foundation for all future generations.
The founding fathers meant
well when they wrote it and signed it into law but they never could imagine a
world where a person would be able to fire more than 2 rounds per minute, let
alone 30. So they could not even fathom a world where a crazy lunatic, fancying
himself after the Joker, bursts into a theater and murders 12 people. They could
imagine a world where the locals would have to rise up and defend themselves
against an oppressive force looking to subjugate them. They knew that if that
were to happen and the people didn’t have access to firearms they may never get
their freedom back.
Why do we still have the
second amendment? Why, when we have a well regulated militia (e.g. the five
branches of the military) and a police force in every municipality across the
country. Should we not be able to trust those in the armed services and the police
to protect us and keep us safe? You may think that with police shootings and
the almost militarization of said police forces that perhaps the police are not
to be trusted. Hollywood would have you believe that the military will just
follow along with the whims of some tiny king dictator (Trump?) to oppress the people of
this country. What we fail to recognize is that those in the military may be
taught to follow orders but that doesn’t make them heartless and stupid.
The people in the military
are taught to defend our country not attack it. I find it hard to believe that
those in the armed services would actually attack the citizens of the United States of America. Of
course this is all conjecture but think about the people who are afraid of this
happening and insist on having guns and then think about the people who join
the military... They tend to be cut from the same cloth. So why would they take
up arms against each other?
In the end it really comes
down to something that people like former Justice Scalia and other Originalist judges never think about it that the founders meant muskets not assault rifles. They
meant farmers and blacksmiths running through the forest fighting men in red
coats not a young man in an elementary school shooting children. The Originalist judges would have you believe that it is the intent not the actual
meaning of the words that should be taken as the law but should we not think
about the world the founders lived in when they had that intent? Should we not
think about the time and place that it was written and not assume that they
just meant every killing machine to be thought of and manufactured in the next
240 years?
The world is a much
different place then it was 240 years ago. We don’t know what the founding
fathers intended. Yet why should we think of what they intended and not how
they intended it to be interpreted? Perhaps I am going over your head. The constitution and the Bill of Rights should not be taken as gospel, ever the same, they are living documents and sometimes a living document needs to be adjusted to fit the needs of those reading it. Think prohibition, then repealing prohibition. Think giving African Americans and women the right to vote. Think abolishing slavery. We have changed the constitution before because it needed to be changed so why not now?
In fact, Jefferson (a founding father) supported
rewriting the constitution every 19 years. Think about that for just a second.
That would mean we would be almost onto our 13th version of the
constitution right now. That of course is a discussion for another day but it
would really change the way we viewed our politics and reshape the very fabric
of our country.
It seems as if I have
veered off again into other topics but it all comes down to guns and the second
amendment. We are addicted to guns in this country and it is because a bunch of
guys in wigs wanted to keep themselves from being taken over by the King of
England. Because a bunch of guys in wigs wrote it down 240 years ago we get to
deal with it mentally unstable people shooting up elementary schools. Because
some people are just to addicted to their guns we can’t feel safe in public
places anymore.
We have an addiction and
it is sickening. We must fight the addiction but most people are unwilling to
admit they have a problem. You would think that after Columbine we would have
hit rock bottom, but that didn’t happen we just blamed it on video games and
not a strict enough dress code. So we took away the baggy pants, put metal
detectors in all the schools, and started rating all our video games. That should stop the problem, they said, but it didn’t.
You would think rock
bottom would be rock bottom when 32 college students were killed at Virginia
Tech. Nope, that would be absurd. So instead we bought more guns and blamed it
on his mental illness. We mourned and we asked for reform but nothing happened.
You would think that he
deaths of 20 first grade students would be rock bottom. I mean how could it not
be? 20 that is a big number. 6 and 7-year-olds every last one of them. How
could the death of all those tiny babies not be the breaking point? How could
we not make more common sense gun laws and make it so no more babies were
killed by lunatics with a right to have a gun? No we bought more guns and
started talking about arming the teachers. “If the teachers had all been armed
this would not have happened.” This is where the myth of the good guy with a
gun comes into play. Also a discussion for another day but also a false ploy to sell more guns.
You would have thought the
other 21 shootings since Newtown and the 400+ deaths would be the moment we as
a nation hit rock bottom. Nope, now when people try to make a statement about
gun violence they are yelled down as politicizing a tragedy. Congress and the
Senate hold moments of silence, we have candlelight vigils, we protest and
nothing happens because 240 years ago some guys wanted to make sure people were
able to keep their muskets.
So now after too many
deaths and not enough reform we sit silently waiting for something to happen.
Waiting for the country to hit rock bottom and admit they have a problem. Well
it doesn’t seem to be working so I propose an intervention. A sit down with the
country. An airing of grievances. A chance to see if we can put the country on
a new course. Will it work, probably not because we are addicts and we just
can’t stop shooting up (sorry for the pun but it had to be done).
When will we hit rock
bottom? What will finally be the driving force that pushed even the most die hard gun addicts over the edge? Will it be when one of their own falls prey to the
hot lead of a bullet? Or will that just reinforce their need for more guns and
more bullets? Will nothing ever be done to stop this epidemic that is sweeping
our country? Is the second amendment purely to blame or is something else,
something even more nefarious, at work?
I am hoping that if anything
should ever happen to these people’s children or friends they might see the
light and understand why this is such an unhealthy addiction. Sure more people
die in car accidents every year but car accidents are exactly that, accidents.
When was the last time they reported a mass shooting as an accidental mass
shooting? Never. You cannot accidentally open fire in a packed movie theater.
Or say you slipped and pulled the trigger 20 times to a judge when she asks
about why you shot up a first grade classroom. There are no accidents when it
comes to guns just negligence.
I know what you are going
to say, “No really it was an accident when that 3-year-old shot his older
sister.” I would say yes it was an accident on the 3-year-old's part but the
adult whose gun was left unsecured like a dirty needle in a crack den was not
an accident it was negligence. “Oh, the kid will never find it.” “I only turned
my back for a second.” Any time you leave a gun loaded you are negligent. Any
time you fail to lock up the gun, you are negligent. The kid may have
accidentally shot their brother, sister, father, mother, or themselves but at
the end of the day. Just like an addict leaving their paraphernalia out they
are negligent and responsible for that death or injury.
I could go on and on about
the similarities between guns and drugs but I will leave you for now to think
on this. We could very easily live in a country where guns are not such a scary
and threatening issue. We have the power to stand up and say, “No More!” We don’t.
We wait until the next mass shooting in a church, school, or night club to spur
us into action. We must continue to fight for guns to be eliminated from the
American psyche or we will never hit rock bottom. If we do not look at truly
getting rid of guns, then we will never end the violence. Guns are never the
answer and they never will be.